Comparisons
Compared by name.
Four comparisons written with one rule: only what each company's public website says, read on a specific date and quoted as is. No third-party estimates, no stale screenshots. Each one says when the other is the right call, because a comparison that always wins is useless to everyone.
Only their public siteWith a verification dateWith “when to choose the other”
How we compare
Only what their site says, with a date.
It is the only way a comparison written by one of the parties can be worth anything. Three rules, and they apply to our column too.
- Single source: each competitor's public site, read on September 2, 2026. If a fact is not on their site, the cell says “not stated”; we don't make it up.
- No third-party prices: the numbers floating around software directories are estimates. If the competitor does not publish pricing, the row says exactly that.
- Our rows come from the product status: the same ones that say we have no channel manager and no payments. If we improve, it changes there and here in the same commit.
If after reading you are still here.
Signing up is free, guided and asks for no card. And if the comparison made it clear you need what we don't have yet, it did its job too.
01You sign up and load a property.
02You try the engine and the assistant with your data.
03You pick a plan only if something changed for you.